Port create-defect, create-story, estimate-issues, fix-defect, implement-feature and split-story commands, adapted for GitOps (kustomize build + kubectl dry-run gates, NCI routing). implement-feature now walks subtasks, respects blocked-by, and reports cross-project (NCS/NCWF) tasks. Ignore .claude/worktrees. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.1 KiB
Executable File
Create Defect in YouTrack
Automated defect creation workflow. Topic/hint: $ARGUMENTS
This is the GitOps repo (Kustomize / Helm / Argo CD / Kargo on Kubernetes).
Defects raised here usually belong to project NCI, but routing in Step 5 still
applies.
Step 1 — Gather Context
Use AskUserQuestion tool to ask the user (max 4 questions at once):
- Component — Where does the bug occur? (e.g. argocd, kargo, ingress-nginx, cert-manager, postgres, redis, sealed-secrets, a nowchess overlay, a region/deployment)
- What breaks — What is the actual (broken) behavior? (sync failure, render error, pod crashloop, cert not issued, etc.)
- Expected — What should happen instead?
- Reproducibility — Always reproducible? Which cluster/region/overlay triggers it?
If $ARGUMENTS already answers some of these, skip those questions.
Step 2 — Research (if needed)
If the bug involves manifests, overlays, or rendering:
- Search repo for relevant paths (
Grep/Bash) under the affected component dir. - Render the suspect path:
kustomize build --enable-helm <path>and inspect output. - Validate:
kustomize build --enable-helm <path> | kubectl apply --dry-run=client -f -. - Do NOT guess at root cause. Surface findings before drafting.
Step 3 — Draft Defect
Compose the full defect report using this template:
Summary
[One-sentence description of what is broken.]
Steps to Reproduce
1. Step one
2. Step two
3. Step three
Expected Behavior
[What should happen.]
Actual Behavior
[What actually happens.]
Environment / Notes
[Any relevant context: cluster/region, overlay path, Argo CD app name, kustomize/helm versions, error output — only if applicable.]
Rules:
- Steps must be minimal and reproducible (prefer a
kustomize build/kubectl --dry-runcommand). - Expected vs actual: concrete and unambiguous.
- Omit "Environment / Notes" section if not relevant.
Step 4 — Clarify
Show the draft to the user.
Use AskUserQuestion tool to ask:
- Are steps to reproduce complete and accurate?
- Severity: Blocker / Critical / Major / Minor / Trivial?
- Any related tickets or recent changes to link?
Incorporate feedback. Repeat until user approves.
Step 5 — Determine Project
Project routing rules (always apply these):
- Infrastructure (Kubernetes, Argo CD, Kargo, pipelines, CI/CD, DB setup, cloud infra) →
NCI- Backend code (game engine, bots, API, services, coordinator) →
NCS- Frontend code (UI, UX, web app) →
NCWF
- Kubernetes / Argo CD / Kargo / pipelines / infrastructure → project:
NCI(default for this repo) - Backend / coordinator / systems / bot / engine → project:
NCS - Frontend / UI / UX → project:
NCWF
If ambiguous, ask the user.
Step 6 — Create Issue
Call mcp__youtrack__create_issue with:
project: determined in Step 5summary: concise title describing what is broken (≤72 chars, sentence case)description: full formatted defect report from Step 3 (Markdown)type:Bug
Step 7 — Report
Display the created issue ID and URL. Ask if a linked investigation or fix task is needed.