docs: add automated workflows for defect fixing, user story creation, and issue estimation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Implement Feature from YouTrack
|
||||
|
||||
Automated feature-implementation workflow. Ticket ID: `$ARGUMENTS`
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 1 — Fetch Ticket
|
||||
|
||||
Call `mcp__youtrack__get_issue` with ID `$ARGUMENTS`.
|
||||
Extract and display: summary, description, acceptance criteria, Priority, Subsystem.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 2 — Create Worktree
|
||||
|
||||
Derive branch name from ticket:
|
||||
- `type` from YouTrack issue type: `feature`/`task` → `feat`, `refactor` → `refactor`, `bug` → `fix`, else `chore`
|
||||
- `scope` from affected module/component (kebab-case, omit if unclear)
|
||||
- `description` from ticket summary: lowercase, kebab-case, max 40 chars, drop articles
|
||||
|
||||
Branch format: `<type>/<ticket-id>-<description>`
|
||||
Example: `feat/NOW-456-add-bot-difficulty-slider`
|
||||
|
||||
Call `EnterWorktree` with that branch name.
|
||||
All subsequent file work happens inside this worktree.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 3 — Understand Requirements (read-only)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `./compile` — confirm baseline is green.
|
||||
2. Run `./test` — confirm baseline is green.
|
||||
3. Spawn `cavecrew-investigator` with: ticket description + acceptance criteria → locate affected files, relevant types/interfaces, entry points, integration touch-points.
|
||||
4. **If anything is ambiguous (scope unclear, acceptance criteria missing, design decisions needed), use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask — max 4 questions at once.**
|
||||
5. **Report plan to user: what will be added/changed, which files, which modules. No file writes yet. Wait for acknowledgement before continuing.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 4 — Implement
|
||||
|
||||
1. Implement feature (use `scala-implementer` agent for non-trivial changes; inline edits for small ones).
|
||||
2. Run `./compile` — must be green.
|
||||
3. Run `./test` — must be green (add new tests for new behaviour; do not modify existing tests unless requirements changed).
|
||||
4. Run `./lint` — must be green.
|
||||
If any step fails, iterate until all pass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 5 — Review
|
||||
|
||||
Spawn `cavecrew-reviewer` on the full diff.
|
||||
Display findings grouped by severity.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 6 — Confirm + Push
|
||||
|
||||
Show summary: ticket, branch, files changed, review findings.
|
||||
**Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask for explicit approval before pushing.** Include any open questions about commit message scope or body if unclear.
|
||||
|
||||
On approval, commit following Conventional Commits:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
<type>(<scope>): <short description, imperative, ≤50 chars>
|
||||
|
||||
<optional body: what changed and why, wrap at 72 chars>
|
||||
|
||||
Closes $ARGUMENTS
|
||||
https://knockoutwhist.youtrack.cloud/issue/$ARGUMENTS
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- `type`: same as branch type (`feat`, `refactor`, `chore`, etc.)
|
||||
- `scope`: affected module (`core`, `rule`, `api`, `bot`, `io`)
|
||||
- Subject: imperative mood, no period, lowercase
|
||||
- Footer `Closes $ARGUMENTS` and ticket URL always present
|
||||
|
||||
Push branch to remote.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 7 — Comment on Ticket
|
||||
|
||||
After successful push, call `mcp__youtrack__add_issue_comment` on `$ARGUMENTS` with:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Branch `<branch-name>` pushed.
|
||||
|
||||
<one-sentence summary of what was added and why>
|
||||
|
||||
Files changed:
|
||||
- <file1>
|
||||
- <file2>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 8 — Cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
Call `ExitWorktree` to delete the worktree.
|
||||
Report: branch pushed, ticket commented, worktree deleted, done.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user