e13c9c2637
Port create-defect, create-story, estimate-issues, fix-defect, implement-feature and split-story commands, adapted for GitOps (kustomize build + kubectl dry-run gates, NCI routing). implement-feature now walks subtasks, respects blocked-by, and reports cross-project (NCS/NCWF) tasks. Ignore .claude/worktrees. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
118 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
118 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
# Create User Story in YouTrack
|
|
|
|
Automated user-story creation workflow. Topic/hint: `$ARGUMENTS`
|
|
|
|
This is the **GitOps** repo (Kustomize / Helm / Argo CD / Kargo on Kubernetes).
|
|
Stories raised here usually belong to project `NCI`, but routing in Step 5 still
|
|
applies. Note: infra work is often framed as a task rather than a user story —
|
|
use `Task` type when there is no end-user-facing value.
|
|
|
|
## Step 1 — Gather Context
|
|
|
|
Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask the user (max 4 questions at once):
|
|
|
|
1. **Domain** — Is this infrastructure work, or does it touch backend/frontend?
|
|
2. **Actor** — Who benefits? (e.g. operator, developer, deployment pipeline, the platform itself)
|
|
3. **Action** — What capability/change is needed? (new component, region, rollout strategy, secret, ingress, etc.)
|
|
4. **Goal/value** — Why? What outcome does it enable? (reliability, security, cost, velocity)
|
|
|
|
If `$ARGUMENTS` already answers some of these, skip those questions.
|
|
|
|
## Step 2 — Research (if needed)
|
|
|
|
If the topic involves unfamiliar manifests, charts, or constraints:
|
|
- Search the repo for relevant paths (use `Grep`/`Bash`); read `ARCHITECTURE.md` / `CONFIGURATION.md` for structure.
|
|
- Render relevant overlays: `kustomize build --enable-helm <path>`.
|
|
- Use `WebSearch` for Helm chart docs, Argo CD / Kargo / Kubernetes API references.
|
|
- Do NOT guess. Surface findings before drafting.
|
|
|
|
## Step 3 — Draft Story
|
|
|
|
Compose the full story using this template:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
As a [type of user/actor]
|
|
I want to [perform an action / have a capability]
|
|
So that [achieve a goal or value]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
[Additional context or operational rationale for this story.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
[List the specific, measurable criteria that define when this story is done:]
|
|
|
|
- Criterion 1
|
|
- Criterion 2
|
|
- Criterion 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation Notes
|
|
|
|
[Technical notes: affected components/overlays, charts, regions, design refs, constraints.]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Rules:
|
|
- User story line: plain English, present tense, from the actor's perspective.
|
|
- Acceptance criteria: testable, unambiguous, one condition each (e.g. "kustomize build renders without error", "Argo CD app syncs healthy").
|
|
- Implementation notes: optional — only include if there are known constraints, related tickets, or design refs.
|
|
|
|
## Step 4 — Clarify Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
Show the draft to the user.
|
|
**Use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask:**
|
|
- Are the acceptance criteria complete and correct?
|
|
- Any implementation constraints to add?
|
|
- Priority (if known)?
|
|
|
|
Incorporate feedback. Repeat until user approves.
|
|
|
|
## Step 5 — Determine Project
|
|
|
|
> **Project routing rules (always apply these):**
|
|
> - Infrastructure (Kubernetes, Argo CD, Kargo, pipelines, CI/CD, DB setup, cloud infra) → `NCI`
|
|
> - Backend code (game engine, bots, API, services, coordinator) → `NCS`
|
|
> - Frontend code (UI, UX, web app) → `NCWF`
|
|
|
|
- Kubernetes / Argo CD / Kargo / pipelines / infrastructure → project: `NCI` (default for this repo)
|
|
- Backend / coordinator / systems / bot / engine → project: `NCS`
|
|
- Frontend / UI / UX → project: `NCWF`
|
|
|
|
If still ambiguous, ask the user.
|
|
|
|
## Step 6 — Create Issue
|
|
|
|
Call `mcp__youtrack__create_issue` with:
|
|
- `project`: determined in Step 5
|
|
- `summary`: concise title derived from the "I want to" clause (≤72 chars, sentence case)
|
|
- `description`: full formatted story from Step 3 (Markdown)
|
|
- `type`: `Task` for purely technical infra work (default here), `Feature` if it delivers user-facing value.
|
|
|
|
## Step 7 — Link Issues
|
|
|
|
After creation, ask the user (use `AskUserQuestion` if interactive, otherwise infer from context):
|
|
|
|
> Are there related issues to link? (skip if none)
|
|
|
|
Collect any issue IDs the user mentions. For each, determine the correct relation and call `mcp__youtrack__link_issues`:
|
|
|
|
| Situation | Relation to use |
|
|
|-----------|----------------|
|
|
| This must be done before another | `blocks` |
|
|
| Another must be done before this | `is blocked by` |
|
|
| They share domain or are related | `relates to` |
|
|
| This is a child of an epic/story | `subtask of` |
|
|
| This is a parent grouping subtasks | `parent for` |
|
|
| This depends on another ticket's output | `depends on` |
|
|
|
|
If the user mentions an issue in the description or implementation notes (e.g. "see NCS-42", "after NCI-12 is done"), auto-detect and suggest linking it — confirm before creating the link.
|
|
|
|
## Step 8 — Report
|
|
|
|
Display the created issue ID and URL.
|
|
List any links created (relation type + linked issue ID).
|
|
Ask if a linked sub-task or implementation ticket is needed.
|